Um, the thing in the first picture is a common weed. I don't know the name of it, but it's sort of like chickweed -- low, creeps along the ground, sprouts in the fall, overwinters, grows in the spring. I fight it every year in my yard, too. The second thing, the white fuzzy one, is a perennial groundcover known as snow-on-the-mountain, snow-in-summer, mouse ears, etc., Cerastium tomentosum. It's a fairly common plant, nothing rare or exotic. Makes a good groundcover in dry, sunny areas. Has smallish white flowers like annual baby's breath in late spring, early summer.

I believe it's Pilea, Clearweed Here is a link that might be useful: Pilea pumila

It's not really possible to name specific snapdragons from a picture. They hybridise with abandon and throw up seedlings with all sorts of colours. Just call it a pinky-orange Antirrhinum majus. They are all perennial under the right conditions. This post was edited by flora_uk on Sat, Dec 8, 12 at 13:05

They look like 1920-40s mass-market chairs based on the 1890s classical revival of the 1780s neoclassical movement because .... 1 - The back x-frames are absolutely flat, not finished to match the fronts like better furniture would be. 2 - the side rails in the neo-classical ones from the 1890s are straight or fluted, not squiggly like these. The squiggles are contamination from the popular "Jacobethan" ornateness of that era. 3 - The front x-frame is also flat, an indication it was jig-sawed or press-cut from plywood and veneered, and has the rounded lip that was widely used in that era. Better chairs would clearly show the individual pieces they were made from. 4 - The upholstery is inset in a delicately curved wooden frame ... the shape reeks of the 1930s popular style.